Tänään on valtamediassa esitelty tätä päivää merkkipaaluna, missä maapallon ihmisväestön määrä on saavuttanut 7 miljardin rajapyykin ylityksen (Hesarin juttu). Siinä etenkin globalistieliitin viherfasismia promotoiva klikki on nimenomaan toitottanut sitä, että tällainen väestön määrän lisääntyminen on erittäin "vaarallista", "haitallista" ja vaatii "nopeita väestönrajoittamistoimia". Lisäksi lännen maailmankuvavankilan tämän vaiheen aivopesemät hyväuskoiset "kätyrit" ja "rahvas" ovat ottaneet tämän ohjeeksi ja pohjaksi hahmottaa "maailmanparannusta".
Väestön ns. liikamäärähän on ollut tuttu globalistieliitin eräs tärkeimmistä käsikassaroista oikeuttaa heidät promotoimaan ja kätyreineen harjoittamaan tyrannista ja (neo)feodaalisesti tarhaavaa väestönkontrollia sekä eugeniikkaa jopa jo yli 100 vuoden ajan sekä osaltaan jo paljon pidempäänkin näiden "eliittiperiaatteiden" esi-isinä toimineiden Thomas Malthusin ja Giammaria Ortesin teesien pohjalta.
Tarkoitukseni on alkaa nyt kyseenalaistaa entistä pontevammin ja syvällisemmin tämäkin osa globalistieliitin maailmanherruus- ja kaikkivoipaisuusharhoistaan sekä niiden vaarallisista vaikutuksista yhteiskuntiimme ja niissä ns. tavallisen väestön maailmankuvan muodostukseen. Sitä varten kokoan aluksi kolmeen eri koosteeseen tämän eliitin piirissä esiintyviä ajatuksia aiheeseen liittyen. Nämä koosteet toimivat tausta-aineistona tulossa oleville analyyttisille aihetta käsitteleville pohdinnoilleni ja ohjelman muodostuksilleni neorenessanssin sisältöä hahmottaen... Niistä todennäköisesti valikoituu myös se ensimmäinen laajemman mediapiirin juttuni (Kaksi kirjoittamiseeni liittyvää ilmoitusta: Tekstivikojen korjaus ja uusi laajempi media kirjoituksilleni...).
Tämän ensimmäisen tietokoosteen pohjana on Infowars -sivustolta löytämäni alkuperäisesti American Dream -sivuston äskettäinen juttu (From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite), jonka kirjoittaja Michael haluaa pysyä melko anonyyminä kirjoittajana (Tässä hän kertoo jotain itsestään). Seuraavaksi runsas valikoima tietoa lainauksinani hänen kokoamastaan ko. jutusta --->
Michaelin kirjoittamaa: "The United Nations has officially designated October 31st as 7 Billion Day. On that day, the United Nations estimates that the population of the earth will hit 7 billion for the very first time. But instead of celebrating what a milestone 7 billion people represents, the UNPF is focusing instead on using October 31st to raise awareness about “sustainability” and “sustainable development.".
Michaelin kirjoittamaa: "In other words, the United Nations is once again declaring that there are way too many people on the planet and that we need to take more direct measures to reduce fertility. In recent years, the UN and other international organizations have become bolder about trying to push the sick population control agenda of the global elite. Most of the time organizations such as the UN will simply talk about “stabilizing” the global population, but as you will see in this article, there are many among the global elite that are not afraid to openly talk about a goal of reducing the population of the world to 500 million (or less). To you and I it may seem like insanity to want to get rid of more than 90 percent of the global population, but there is a growing consensus among the global elite that this is absolutely necessary for the good of the planet.".
Michaelin kirjoittamaa: "Today, “sustainable development” has become one of the key buzzwords that those in the radical environmental movement love to use, but most Americans have no idea that one of the key elements of “sustainable development” is population control.
So what precisely is considered to be an ideal population for the earth by those pushing “sustainable development”?
Well, of course there is much disagreement on this issue, but many are very open about the fact that they believe that the earth should only have 500 million people (or less) on it.".
Seuraavaksi Michaelin esilletuomia globalistien ja heidän "ajatushautomoidensa" sutkautuksia --->
For example, the first of the “new 10 commandments” on the infamous Georgia Guidestones states the following….: "Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.".
CNN Founder Ted Turner would go even farther: "A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.".
Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First, says that reducing our population down to 100 million is one of his three main goals….: "My three main goals would be to reduce human population to about 100 million worldwide, destroy the industrial infrastructure and see wilderness, with it’s full complement of species, returning throughout the world.".
Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka once wrote the following….: "I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.".
Mikhail Gorbachev thinks that reducing the global population by 90 percent would be just about right….: "We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.".
Jeffrey D. Sachs, the director of The Earth Institute at Columbia University, recently said the following in an article for CNN….: "The arrival of the 7 billionth person is cause for profound global concern. It carries a challenge: What will it take to maintain a planet in which each person has a chance for a full, productive and prosperous life, and in which the planet’s resources are sustained for future generations?
How, in short, can we enjoy ‘sustainable development’ on a very crowded planet?".
"The second key to sustainable development is the stabilization of the global population. This is already occurring in high-income and even some middle-income countries, as families choose to have one or two children on average. The reduction of fertility rates should be encouraged in the poorer countries as well.".
In a recent article for the Guardian, Roger Martin stated that all of the problems that humanity is facing would be easier to solve if less people were running around the planet….: " …all environmental (and many economic and social) problems are easier to solve with fewer people, and ultimately impossible with ever more.".
"On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.".
In fact, you are starting to see an increasing number of people in the western world actually suggest that we adopt a “one-child policy” such as China has. For example, the following is from an opinion piece that appeared in the National Post….: "A planetary law, such as China’s one-child policy, is the only way to reverse the disastrous global birthrate currently, which is one million births every four days.".
"The intelligence behind this is the following:
-If only one child per female was born as of now, the world’s population would drop from its current 6.5 billion to 5.5 billion by 2050, according to a study done for scientific academy Vienna Institute of Demography.
-By 2075, there would be 3.43 billion humans on the planet. This would have immediate positive effects on the world’s forests, other species, the oceans, atmospheric quality and living standards.".
I have already discussed the horrific one-child policy in China. As the Epoch Times recently noted, enforcement of this policy can be absolutely brutal….: "Pregnant women lacking birth permits are hunted down like criminals by population planning police in China and forcibly aborted.".
For example, just check out what a recent National Geographic article said happened when social planners in India tried to aggressively reduce birth rates in India in the 1970s….: "The Indian government tried once before to push vasectomies, in the 1970s, when anxiety about the population bomb was at its height. Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and her son Sanjay used state-of-emergency powers to force a dramatic increase in sterilizations. From 1976 to 1977 the number of operations tripled, to more than eight million. Over six million of those were vasectomies. Family planning workers were pressured to meet quotas; in a few states, sterilization became a condition for receiving new housing or other government benefits. In some cases the police simply rounded up poor people and hauled them to sterilization camps.".
Recently, Al Gore made the following statement regarding population control….: "One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.".
---> Michaelin tuohon huomiona kirjoittamaa: "The elite love to use terms such as “fertility management” and “family planning”, but what they really intend is for there to be less pregnancies and more abortions so that the population will not grow as quickly.
They certainly do not intend to empower women to have more children.".
This agenda was also very much reflected when the March 2009 U.N. Population Division policy brief asked this shocking question….: "What would it take to accelerate fertility decline in the least developed countries?".
But to many in the global elite, trying to get women to have less babies makes all the sense in the world. In a recent editorial for the New York Times entitled “The Earth Is Full“, Thomas L. Friedman made the following statement….: "You really do have to wonder whether a few years from now we’ll look back at the first decade of the 21st century — when food prices spiked, energy prices soared, world population surged, tornados plowed through cities, floods and droughts set records, populations were displaced and governments were threatened by the confluence of it all — and ask ourselves: What were we thinking? How did we not panic when the evidence was so obvious that we’d crossed some growth/climate/natural resource/population redlines all at once?".
These people honestly and truly believe this stuff.
Unfortunately, this agenda is even represented in the highest levels of our own government.
Barack Obama’s top science advisor, John P. Holdren, once wrote the following….: "A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.".
"Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.".
Michael jatkaa: The following are 8 more quotes that show the mindset that a lot of these population control advocates have…. --->
Microsoft’s Bill Gates….: "The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s heading up to about nine billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.".
U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg….: "Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.".
David Rockefeller….: "The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.".
Jacques Cousteau….: "In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.".
Prince Phillip, the Duke of Edinburgh….: "If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower human population levels.".
David Brower, first Executive Director of the Sierra Club….: "Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.".
Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger….: "The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.".
Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12….: "Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.".
According to a recent article in the Daily Mail, thousands of “abnormal” babies are now being selectively aborted in the UK each year…..: "Thousands of pregnancies were aborted last year for ‘abnormalities’ including 500 for Down’s syndrome, new figures reveal.
In total, there were 2,290 abortions for medical problems with the foetus, with 147 performed after 24 weeks.".
Michael mainostaa ---> In a previous article, I described the type of world that the radical population control advocates see for our future….: "Imagine going to sleep one night and waking up many years later in a totally different world. In this futuristic world, literally everything you do is tightly monitored and controlled by control freak bureaucrats in the name of “sustainable development” and with the goal of promoting “the green agenda”. An international ruling body has centralized global control over all human activity. What you eat, what you drink, where you live, how warm or cold your home can be and how much fuel you can use is determined by them. Anyone that dissents or that tries to rebel against the system is sent off for “re-education”. The human population is 90 percent lower than it is today in this futuristic society, and all remaining humans have been herded into tightly constricted cities which are run much like prisons.".
"This is the endgame for the radical green agenda. In order to save the earth, they feel as though they must dramatically reduce our numbers and very tightly control our activities.
But is that the kind of a future that anyone would actually want to live in? Would anyone actually choose to live in a future where bureaucrats micromanage our lives for the good of the environment?".
Michaelin jutun oheen listatut muut aihetta käsittelevät tai sivuavat aikaisemmat Infowars -sivuston jutut --->
Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control
UK “Green Advsior” Says Population Must Fall to 30 Million
Billionaire: Elite Want Two-Thirds Of The “Dumb People” Wiped Off The Planet
Global population study launched by Royal Society
Depopulation Fanatics, Eugenicists Launch “Objective” Global Population Study
The Elite’s Plan For Global Extermination
World Bank Threatens “Drastic Steps Necessary” if Nations Refuse Population Reduction Implementation
Global Warming: The New Word for Mandates and Population Control
Agenda 21 Alert: Obama’s $250 Million Plan to Brainwash Your Children
By 2019, Taxpayers Will Pay $196 Billion A Year for Obamacare, But 24 Million People Will Remain Uninsured
Eugenics Alert: UN’s Agenda of Population Control Accelerating
Global Elite Designed Sanctions to Kill and Impoverish the People of Iran.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment